Smoke Alarms Not Tested
Smoke Alarms Not Tested is a critical compliance defect SURE inspectors have documented across 146 inspection reports. Highest concentration in Ellenbrook.
Causes
- Standard pre-purchase inspection scope does not include testing or certifying these electrical and fire safety components
- Inspection limitation (not tested by inspector)
- Potential non-compliance with current standards
- N/A (issue is lack of testing/verification)
- Not tested as part of the inspection scope
Symptoms to look for
- No documentation or verification of current compliance status for RCDs and smoke alarms provided in the report
- Smoke alarms present but not verified for functionality or compliance
- Smoke alarms present but not verified for function or compliance
- Smoke alarm sighted but functionality/compliance not verified
- Smoke alarms present but functionality/compliance unconfirmed
Remedies
- Engage a qualified electrician to inspect, test, and certify RCDs and smoke alarms to ensure they meet current Australian Standards (e.g., AS3786 for smoke alarms) and local regulations
- Have a licensed electrician assess and certify all electrical wiring and components, including smoke alarms, prior to purchase
- Consult an electrician for advice on installed alarms, testing, and certification, or for installation of new alarms
- Engage a licensed electrician to test and certify smoke alarms as per Australian Standard AS3786 before settlement
- Consult an electrician to test, advise on location/type, and certify smoke alarms before settlement
Where we see this most
These suburbs show the highest concentration of smoke alarms not tested in our inspection data (minimum five observations). Click a suburb to see its full defect profile.
Get an inspector through this property.
Findings in this category skew high severity. If you are under contract, we can usually book inside the cooling-off window. Every inspection includes 12 months of free advice.
Curated entries in Compliance
- Curated 5–5/5Non-Compliant Pool Fence Gate - Self-Closing or Self-Latching Failure
I tested the pool barrier gate against AS 1926.1 and it failed to self-close and self-latch from one or more start positions, or I measured the latch release below 1500mm, or I passed a 100mm gauge beside or beneath the gate leaf. Sometimes the gate swings inward toward the pool rather than outward. Pool drowning remains the leading cause of accidental death for Australian children under five, and gate failure is the single most common finding I record at annual pool barrier inspections.
- Curated 3–5/5Missing or Non-Compliant Handrail on Stair Flight
I inspected a stair flight of four or more risers (or any stair with an open side or a drop greater than 1m) and found no continuous handrail, or I measured the top-of-rail outside the 865-1000mm band I reference from NCC 3.9.2. I also note handrails that terminate short of the top or bottom nosing, flat-topped timber caps wider than 50mm I cannot grip from above, or rails removed during renovation and never reinstated. In my experience this defect is a leading contributor to domestic fall injuries I see, especially on external deck stairs and split-level entries.
- Curated 4–5/5Climbable Horizontal Members or Excessive Gaps in Balustrade
I inspected a balustrade on a deck, balcony, or stair with a drop greater than 1m and found horizontal rails, lattice, or decorative infill a child could foothold, or I measured gaps between vertical members wider than 125mm. When I test the lower portion with a sphere gauge I find climbable surfaces in the zone 150-760mm above finished floor. Reference: NCC 3.9.2.5 (non-climbable zone in effect since 1996). I see this on both post-1996 builds and older homes that were rebalustraded without the rule being considered.
- Curated 2–4/5Glass Door or Full-Height Panel Missing Visibility Marking
I inspected a fully glazed door or frameless glass panel where the pane has no contrasting visibility marking and can be mistaken for an open passage. Reference: AS 1288. I see this most often on frameless pivot doors, large stacker sliders, and floor-to-ceiling living room glazing in modern architectural homes. In my experience the injury pattern from walk-into incidents is forehead, nose, and wrist trauma, with children and elderly occupants disproportionately affected.
- Curated 4–5/5Non-Safety Glazing in Human Impact Zones (Doors, Low Panels, Wet Areas)
I identified annealed (non-safety) glass in a human impact location - most commonly a door, a side panel beside a door, a low sill window, or a shower or bath enclosure. The pane carries no Grade A safety stamp (no 'T', 'L', or compliance mark I could locate in the corner etchings). In my experience non-safety glass shatters into large shards on impact and is responsible for the majority of domestic glass-laceration injuries I see. Reference: AS 1288. Common in pre-1989 housing, unrenovated bathrooms, and owner-built extensions with salvaged glass.
- Curated 4–5/5Pool Fence Climbable Zone Breach - Objects or Features Within NCZ
I measured around the pool barrier and found objects, landscaping, or building features a child could use to scale the fence - inside the 900mm outside arc and/or the 300mm inside zone I check against AS 1926.1. Typical breaches I record include pot plants, pool pumps, retaining walls, trees, pergola posts, and outdoor furniture pushed against the fence line. Extremely common on established properties where landscaping has matured around an originally compliant barrier.