Skip to content
Defect type ·612 observations
High · 2–4/5

No Visible Evidence of Previous Termite Treatment

Termite/real

No Visible Evidence of Previous Termite Treatment is a high-severity termite defect SURE inspectors have documented across 611 inspection reports. Highest concentration in Ellenbrook.

Causes

  • Potentially ineffective or poorly documented previous treatment.
  • Unconfirmed efficiency of existing termite protection system
  • Unconfirmed efficacy of existing termite protection system
  • Absence of visible previous termite treatment evidence
  • No treatment applied, or evidence concealed/degraded

Symptoms to look for

  • Absence of drill holes, treatment notices, or other signs of previous treatment
  • No visible documentation or clear evidence of past termite treatments
  • No visible evidence of a previous termite treatment was located
  • Uncertainty about ongoing termite protection efficacy
  • Illegible or worn durable notice in the meter box

Remedies

  • Engage a pest control technician to review the termite site management plan and install a new chemical barrier
  • Obtain copies of all paperwork and make inquiries regarding previous termite work and warranty information
  • Arrange for a treatment in accordance with Australian Standard 3660 to reduce the risk of further attack
  • Contact the treatment company (if identifiable) to obtain information about past treatments and warranty
  • Engage a pest control technician to implement a termite site management plan in accordance with AS3660
Inspection geography

Where we see this most

These suburbs show the highest concentration of no visible evidence of previous termite treatment in our inspection data (minimum five observations). Click a suburb to see its full defect profile.

Critical

Get an inspector through this property.

Findings in this category skew high severity. If you are under contract, we can usually book inside the cooling-off window. Every inspection includes 12 months of free advice.

Inspector-written

Curated entries in Termite

All entries →
  • Curated 2–4/5
    Slab Edge Concealed by Soil, Paving, or Raised Garden Beds

    I walked the perimeter and could not see a continuous strip of exposed slab edge - raised garden beds, soil, paving, or decorative stone have buried it. Reference: AS 3660.1 and AS 3660.2. In my experience a concealed slab edge lets subterranean termites bridge the edge barrier out of sight, entering the cavity or framing without leaving mud leads where I can find them.

  • Curated 1–4/5
    Mulch and Garden Beds Against House

    Organic mulch and irrigated garden beds placed directly against the external walls create a moisture-rich, cellulose-rich environment that is attractive to subterranean termites and conceals the slab edge from visual inspection. AS 3660.1 and AS 3660.2 identify direct contact between landscaping materials and the structure as a conducive condition requiring correction.

  • Curated 1–5/5
    Timber in Contact with Ground

    Timber structural elements - deck posts, pergola framing, sleeper retaining walls, or firewood stacks - sitting directly in or against soil create an unobstructed termite pathway into the building and accelerate fungal decay. AS 3660.1 requires all structural timber to be isolated from soil to maintain a visible inspection zone; ground contact eliminates this requirement entirely and removes any chance of early detection.

  • Curated 1–4/5
    High Termite Risk Due to Environmental Surrounds

    The property's location near large trees, bushland, or parkland places it in elevated termite territory. Proximity to established timber sources and native vegetation significantly increases foraging pressure on nearby structures, and AS 3660.1 recognises environmental context as a primary risk factor when specifying termite management requirements.

  • Curated 1–4/5
    Concealed Internal Wall Areas (Termite Risk)

    Internal wall cavities, top plates in the roof space, and sub-floor framing cannot be visually inspected during a standard building inspection. AS 4349.3 requires inspectors to report whenever access limitations prevent verification of timber condition - these concealed zones are where termite activity most commonly goes undetected until structural damage is advanced.

  • Curated 1–4/5
    Tree Stumps on Site

    Tree stumps left in the ground provide an established food source and potential nesting site for subterranean termites. Once a colony is established in a stump, foraging extends radially - typically 50–100 m - placing any timber-framed structure on the property within reach.

Same category

More from Termite

All entries →
9,237 inspections
242,618 defects found
30,388 defect types
Local franchise owners
Head office backing

Built to last. Inspected to be SURE.

One inspection, twelve months of advice, and the same person on the other end of the phone every time you call. That is the part you do not see on the brochure.

Same-day reports (subject to access and availability) 12 months free advice Your inspector reads every report
Start my quote
Or call 1300 787 327 business hours support

9,237 inspections · 242,618 defects found · Inspector-owned franchises